The Supreme Court dismissed the Revenue’s SLP and upheld that mere detection of excess stock does not automatically warrant confiscation under Section 130 of the CGST Act. Authorities must ordinarily proceed under Sections 73/74 for tax determination unless stringent conditions for confiscation are clearly met

Additional Commissioner Grade-2 vs. Vijay Trading Company (SLP (C) Diary No. 5881 of 2025) 1. Brief Facts The Assessee, Vijay Trading Company, was subjected to inspection/search under the CGST Act. During inspection, excess stock of goods was allegedly found. The...

The Supreme Court held that ITC cannot be denied to a bona fide purchasing dealer merely because the selling dealer failed to deposit tax with the Government. Recovery action must be taken against the defaulting seller, not the innocent purchaser.

Commissioner, Trade & Tax, Delhi vs. Shanti Kiran India (P) Ltd. (Civil Appeal Nos. 2042–2047 of 2015 Supreme Court of India) 1. Brief Facts The Respondent-Assessee, Shanti Kiran India (P) Ltd., was a registered dealer under the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004....

The Rajasthan High Court held that refund of accumulated ITC under inverted duty structure for periods prior to 18.07.2022 cannot be denied. ITC being an indefeasible vested right, subsequent circulars or clarifications cannot operate retrospectively to curtail accrued credit.

Swastik Oil Industries & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. (D.B. Civil Writ Petition Nos. 11549/2023 & connected matters) Brief Facts The petitioners challenged denial of refund of accumulated ITC under inverted duty structure for periods prior to 18.07.2022....